Watchman Chew Is Right, Yeah ...

As usual, whenever the most-revered, most qualified, venerable Watchman-Pope-Apostle-Prophet-Author (Watchman-P.A.P.A.) Daniel Chew Huicong (a.k.a. the pseudo-evangelical Pope) declares any statement “ex-cathedral,” his cronies would accept it as “biblical” fact or truth. Such statements are frequently replete with logical fallacies and factual inconsistencies – which is actually the inbred mark of the self-glorifying ODMer’s “papers” and “posts.”

In a recent post, he wrote, “For those who have seen the disgusting anti-Christian spirit behind the AODMers, this is nothing new. Truth is not much more treasured by those in the New Evangelical and New Evangelical Calvinism camp anymore than in non-Evangelical and Emergent circles. Slightly more, but not by much.”

A simple analysis of the aforementioned propositions (which can be done by a primary school leaver) will expose the lack of logic (and intelligence) within the twisted mind of the self-acclaimed Watchman P.A.P.A.

Chew squealed, “For those who have seen the disgusting anti-Christian spirit behind the AODMers, this is nothing new.”

Fallacies: Ad hominem, bare assertion, dicto simpliciter. Where’s the proof? Where’s the data and research on all the AODMers existing on this side of eternity?

“Truth is not much more treasured by those in the New Evangelical and New Evangelical Calvinism camp anymore than in non-Evangelical and Emergent circles.”

Fallacies: Ditto.

I can also yelp, “Truth is not more treasured by Daniel Chew Huicong than by the Beatles.” You see, when you are Watchman P.A.P.A., you can say whatever you want, whenever you want and appear to be well-researched and scholarly, or so he thinks.

“Slightly more, but not by much.”

Fallacies: Ditto. How much more? “Slightly” as compared to what? Based upon what kind of scale or measurement is this conclusion derived? Ah ... ...

Enough said.

Chew is getting more self-deluded. Indeed.